A lunar lander that landed in 1969 would likely be a record for the United States.
That would be the first time a lander has landed on the moon.
The first moon landing occurred on January 20, 1969.
It was the largest of the three moon landings, but only the second in history.
The Apollo 17 mission was also the first mission to land on the Moon.
Nowadays, the Moon is regarded as a celestial wonderland, with a variety of sites ranging from the Grand Canyon to Mount Rainier.
NASA is considering two different landing sites for the lander, both at an altitude of about 500 feet (152 meters), NASA officials told The Associated Press in January.
The lander would be able to test its landing system for radiation.
The landing system is not yet complete.
A lander is powered by the sun and could last for days or weeks at the surface.
This type of mission has never been attempted before, and it would be a new experience for astronauts.
But landing on the lunar surface would require a lot of skills and a lot less fuel.
For example, the landers instruments would be powered by batteries.
The Moon has a dense atmosphere, so they would need to be extremely stable.
They would need enough energy to get to the surface, which is not possible on Earth.
The moon is about 5,600 miles (8,100 kilometers) across and has a gravity of less than 0.02 g.
The surface of the moon is very smooth, but there are huge bumps on the surface and some other areas that can be very bumpy.
The problem is that the Moon’s gravity can change, which makes it difficult to land a landable craft.
The current landing method involves a capsule that is inflated by helium from the Moon, but the current landing system has some major flaws.
The astronauts would need a parachute, which would need an extra piece of hardware.
The rocket that would land the landable lander on the other side of the Moon would need special hardware and could not be reused.
NASA would have to pay for the landing itself.
The agency’s space agency would also pay for it.
A big problem would be that the landing on land would require many changes to the spacecraft.
This could take months, according to the AP.
The two landing sites would have different landers.
The most popular one would be at a point in the South Pole.
This would be where the landing would happen.
The other site would be in the northern hemisphere of the Earth.
In this case, the landing would take place at a different place.
This site is called the Johnson Space Center in Houston.
This landing site is considered the most stable site because the moon would have an ice cap that would make it much less bumpy than other sites.
A moon landing would also require the crew to go into orbit and come back, a new mission that would require some special hardware.
In fact, the space agency has already announced plans to fly two spacecraft on a long-duration mission to the Moon and back.
But NASA would not say if they would be sent to the moon or back again.
The American people have the right to decide who is responsible for the future of our country.
That is a matter of national security.
In the meantime, the United Nations will make its decision, but NASA has promised to do all it can to keep the Moon from falling into the hands of terrorists and terrorists.